dc.contributor.author |
Cockton, Gilbert |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-06-22T18:31:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-06-22T18:31:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Paper presented at MIDI 2013 Conference, 24-25.06.2013, Warsaw, Poland |
pl_PL |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repin.pjwstk.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/186319/145 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In this paper in support of a keynote presentation at
MIDI 2013, I compare three major design paradigms
and their commitments to ‘centric’ design activities
through analyses of their Abstract Design Situations,
which differ in their commitment to making and
co-ordinating various types of design choices.
Combining existing design paradigms provides new
post-centric opportunities for design that are Balanced,
Integrative and Generous (BIG). To realise these
opportunities in design work in specific settings, we
need to provide support via re-usable resources, and
guidance on development and use of local resources to
realise a balanced range of integrated functions.
Abstract Design Situations and Resource Functions are
core concepts within the Working to Choose (W2C)
framework, a systematic conceptual structure that
supports analysis, assessment and improvement of
design work. |
pl_PL |
dc.language.iso |
en |
pl_PL |
dc.subject |
HCI |
pl_PL |
dc.subject |
Engineering Design |
pl_PL |
dc.subject |
Design- Led Innovation |
pl_PL |
dc.subject |
Design Paradigm |
pl_PL |
dc.subject |
Design Resources |
pl_PL |
dc.title |
Human-Centred Design, Engineering Design, Design- Led Innovation, Design Paradigm, Design Resources |
pl_PL |
dc.type |
Working Paper |
pl_PL |