| dc.contributor.author | Cockton, Gilbert | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-22T18:31:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-06-22T18:31:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Paper presented at MIDI 2013 Conference, 24-25.06.2013, Warsaw, Poland | pl_PL |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repin.pjwstk.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/186319/145 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper in support of a keynote presentation at MIDI 2013, I compare three major design paradigms and their commitments to ‘centric’ design activities through analyses of their Abstract Design Situations, which differ in their commitment to making and co-ordinating various types of design choices. Combining existing design paradigms provides new post-centric opportunities for design that are Balanced, Integrative and Generous (BIG). To realise these opportunities in design work in specific settings, we need to provide support via re-usable resources, and guidance on development and use of local resources to realise a balanced range of integrated functions. Abstract Design Situations and Resource Functions are core concepts within the Working to Choose (W2C) framework, a systematic conceptual structure that supports analysis, assessment and improvement of design work. | pl_PL |
| dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | HCI | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Engineering Design | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Design- Led Innovation | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Design Paradigm | pl_PL |
| dc.subject | Design Resources | pl_PL |
| dc.title | Human-Centred Design, Engineering Design, Design- Led Innovation, Design Paradigm, Design Resources | pl_PL |
| dc.type | Working Paper | pl_PL |